While writing my last essay, some of the choices I made as far as how I constructed and pieced together my essay was main points and ideas. The things I thought most important and relevant to the text, that would help a person who maybe has never read the writing before, better understand it. I used the pieces in both “The Human Factor,” and “The Cat’s Cradle,” that stuck out most to me as interesting, or worth writing about and explaining. For example, in “The Human Factor,” when described that the long work schedules affected the studies and concentrations of the working and their quality of work, I thought that by showing the statistics to just how many people really are affected by careless errors, really helped prove the point.
As far as the peer-editing experience goes, everyone obviously has their own personal opinion on whether or not they like it or not, or prefer it. I, however, am one of the fewer, most likely, that doesn’t exactly love it. I perfectly understand and see how other classmates opinions on their work can help get a wider range of thoughts of their writings and help improve it. However, I’ve just always been a person who only cares about the one person’s opinion that actually matters. Maybe that’s just me. I kind of also just think it’s a way, whether we think so or see it at the time, for everyone to secretly form dislikes for one another because of a certain comment made on their work. I’m not someone who would take something like that personally, but I know a lot of people are like that out there. Like I said, I know so many people love that and it helps them piece their writings together better, and most the time it helps me too, I’m just saying. ☺
No comments:
Post a Comment